Regarding unfair dismissal, which statement is CORRECT?

In the context of unfair dismissal, the statement that the remedy includes reinstatement, re-engagement, or compensation is accurate because it reflects the legal framework surrounding claims for unfair dismissal. When an employee is found to have been unfairly dismissed, the employer may be ordered to reinstate the employee to their original position, re-engage them in a similar role, or compensate them financially for the loss of their job. This framework aims to restore the employee's position as much as possible, both in terms of their employment and in financial terms, reflecting the principle of making the employee "whole."

The other options have merit but do not fully encompass the complete truth about unfair dismissal. While it is true that unfair dismissal can be a statutory claim depending on the jurisdiction, the absolute terms of this statement can vary. The assertion that an employee automatically succeeds in their claim if wrongfully dismissed is misleading because the legal determination of "wrongful dismissal" and "unfair dismissal" involves different principles; simply being wrongfully dismissed does not guarantee a successful claim under unfair dismissal terms. Therefore, the focus on the remedies available accurately captures a critical aspect of unfair dismissal claims.