Which of the following methods is a valid way of discharging a contract?

Discharging a contract refers to the termination of the contractual obligations of the parties involved. One valid method of discharging a contract is through specific performance, which is an equitable remedy often ordered by a court when a party has failed to fulfill their part of the agreement. While specific performance is primarily a remedy for breach rather than a way to discharge a contract by fulfilling obligations, it relates to the context of performance and enforcement of the contract's terms, particularly when monetary damages would be insufficient to resolve the legal issue.

In terms of valid methods for discharging a contract, agreement implies a mutual consent between parties to end the contract, which is also a common method. Performance involves the complete and proper execution of contractual duties, effectively discharging the contract. Damages, on the other hand, are a remedy awarded after a breach, compensating the innocent party, rather than discharging the contract itself.

While specific performance is primarily about enforcing the contract, distinguishing it among the potential choices requires recognizing its relevance in legal consideration. The other options represent different approaches to contract law—agreement and performance being methods to discharge, while damages serve as a remedy for breaches rather than a discharging mechanism.