Which of the following terms allows for the possibility of claims for damages in case of non-performance?

The correct answer encompasses the concept that all the listed terms—conditions, warranties, and innominate terms—can indeed lead to claims for damages in the event of non-performance.

Conditions are considered fundamental terms of a contract. If a condition is breached, it allows the aggrieved party not only to seek damages but also to terminate the contract. This reflects the severity of the breach, indicating that performance under the contract is crucial.

Warranties, while less critical than conditions, also bind the parties to certain terms. The breach of a warranty entitles the aggrieved party to claim damages, although it does not provide a right to terminate the entire contract. This reflects the recognition that while the promise might not be central, the failure still holds significant consequences.

Innominate terms, classified under the doctrine of the law of obligations, can give rise to claims for damages depending on the nature of the breach. If the breach of an innominate term has a serious impact on the contract’s overall purpose, it may allow for claims similar to those available for the breach of a condition.

Since each of these types of terms allows for the possibility of claiming damages due to non-performance—albeit in varying degrees and contexts—the broader understanding leads